1. What is a point of order?
The phrase “point of order” refers to a situation where a rule (e.g., portion of the bylaws or Robert’s Rules) is not being followed during an official meeting. A member sees the error and speaks up about it publicly by saying, “Point of order,” so that the Chair can correct a situation where a rule is being ignored or broken.
The concept of “point of order” is often misused. A member cannot call out, “Point of order,” just because they don’t like what’s happening in the meeting, or because an issue is not going their way, or because they want to delay business by focusing on tiny issues that are not actually rules or that don’t violate anyone’s rights.
“Point of order” may only be used to address a mistake that has been made related to the rules of parliamentary procedure. And it is not enough to simply yell, “Point of order!” when there’s a concern about the rules: The member making the point of order must be prepared to state which rule has been violated.
2. Can I interrupt business to make a point of order?
Yes. Point of Order is a motion which may interrupt other proceedings in the meeting. You do not have to raise a hand, wait for the Chair to recognize you, or get in line to speak. You may call out, “Point of order,” and then state the rule that’s not being followed or give a short sentence of detail about the procedural problem you have observed.
3. What if the Chair doesn’t respond to my point of order?
The Chair is not allowed to ignore a legitimate point of order. He is required to make a ruling as to whether the point of order is valid.
After listening to the point of order, he simply states, “Your point is well taken” (i.e., yes, you’re right) or “Your point is not well taken” (i.e., no, this isn’t a problem). If the Chair has agreed with your point of order, then he will lead in correcting the situation.
4. Does a point of order get voted on?
No. A point of order is decided only by a ruling of the Chair—not by a vote. (If a member appeals the ruling of the Chair, the process is different—see #5 below.)
5. What if the Chair says my point of order isn’t valid, but I think I’m right and the Chair’s ruling is wrong?
If the Chair responds to your point of order by stating, “Your point is not well taken,” but you are sure the issue is significant and is a violation of the rules and/or members’ rights, you have the option of appealing the Chair’s decision.
To make an appeal, you simply say, “I appeal the Chair’s decision.” The Chair then invites members to second your appeal and asks if there is any discussion regarding the appealed point of order decision.
You and other members are welcome to defend and explain your thinking about the point of order. Then the Chair is allowed to respond to the discussion. Finally, a vote is taken on the Chair’s decision. A majority is required to overturn the Chair’s ruling.
Where to Learn More
- From Civility
- Other Sources
